{"id":428,"date":"2008-07-12T12:14:52","date_gmt":"2008-07-12T17:14:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.mccambridge.org\/blog\/?p=428"},"modified":"2022-09-11T00:40:38","modified_gmt":"2022-09-11T00:40:38","slug":"unnecessary-sensationalism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.mccambridge.org\/blog\/2008\/07\/unnecessary-sensationalism\/","title":{"rendered":"Unnecessary Sensationalism"},"content":{"rendered":"
I’ve long since gotten tired of American news, in all media: print, evening news, 24-hr talking heads, etc.\u00a0 Everything is so sensationalized and marketed to capture the interest of your average disinterested, entertainment-hungry American.<\/p>\n
But this is trite; I’m saying nothing new.\u00a0 I just wanted to preface the following example, which pissed me off this morning because it’s blatantly sensationalized, and utterly unnecessarily.\u00a0 It’s a story about two “proximity events” near JFK airport, in which two planes came close to their safety margins in terms of distance in air.\u00a0 Notice that the headline is “2nd near collision<\/strong>,” and yet in the article itself very specifically says: “The [FAA] said it was not<\/strong> classifying either incident as a ‘near collision'” (emphasis added).<\/p>\n I’m not sure how much more hypocritical that could possibly get… and this is not our local paper saying this, it’s the Associated Press’s title.\u00a0 If you guys are going to make up headlines without reading the articles, why not go the whole nine yards?\u00a0 I’m thinking: “OMG! Terrorists Nearly Blow Up Planes AGAIN at JFK Airport!”<\/p>\n